Ideas
Nicole Junkermann on What Long Horizons Actually Ask For
Everyone says they think in years. Nicole Junkermann on the ordinary costs a long horizon collects along the way, and why late October is when they fall due.
Back to the blog
A long horizon is the easiest thing in the world to claim and one of the harder things to keep. The claim costs nothing in January. It costs something in late October, when a year has shown most of its shape and a quarter still remains in which to do something about it. Nicole Junkermann finds this the honest moment to ask what a long horizon actually asks of the person holding it.
The first thing it asks for is a tolerance for dull stretches. Long work is not a sequence of interesting decisions. It is mostly maintenance, repetition and small corrections nobody will ever notice, broken up by a handful of moments that matter. Anyone who needs the work to feel significant every week will quietly shorten the horizon without ever admitting to it. Nicole Junkermann takes the view that boredom is rarely a sign that something has gone wrong. More often it is a sign that the slow part is being done properly.
The second is a fixed set of questions. A horizon only holds if the thing being measured stays the same from one year to the next, and it is remarkably easy to change the question halfway through, because a different question usually produces a kinder answer. Keeping the original one written down, in the words it was first asked in, removes most of that temptation. The Notebook is where that kind of sentence lives here, and the point of writing it badly and early is that it cannot be improved later.
The third is patience with being out of step. Anything worked on across years will spend long periods looking wrong to anyone checking in monthly, and no version of a long horizon avoids this. The discomfort is real and it does not fade much with practice. What helps is remembering that the disagreement is usually about the clock rather than the idea. Nicole Junkermann set out the same bargain in why the best ideas are worth the wait, and the shape of it has not changed since.
The fourth is the least comfortable of the four. A long horizon has to carry a clear account of what would change your mind, written early and kept somewhere it can be found. Without it, patience and stubbornness look identical from the inside, and the difference between them is the whole argument. Set down at the start, that account is honest. Reconstructed at the end, it is a story, and a flattering one.
What the four have in common is that none of them is a technique, and none of them says anything at all about what any particular year will do. They are habits of temperament, and temperament is the part of this that can genuinely be practised. Nicole Junkermann does most of that practising in the Reading Room, usually on books with nothing to do with the subject at hand, which is probably why they help.
Late October is a generous time to look at all four together. The year is visibly finite and nothing about it is yet settled. A horizon that survives an honest look in the tenth month is far more likely to be real than one examined in a quiet January, when there is a whole year of room left to be optimistic in.
This article is a personal reflection and general commentary. It is not financial, investment or professional advice.
More from Nicole Junkermann
For more from Nicole Junkermann, read the full profile of Nicole Junkermann, or carry on with the unfashionable value of infrastructure. The Travel Journal keeps the rest of the season.